Skip to content

Conversation

DrFaust92
Copy link
Contributor

apologies, missed this again

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2025 02:46
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 requested review from apeabody, ericyz and a team as code owners September 26, 2025 02:46
@apeabody
Copy link
Collaborator

/gcbrun

Comment on lines 547 to 548
subnetwork = var.additional_ip_ranges_config.value.subnetwork
pod_ipv4_range_names = var.additional_ip_ranges_config.value.pod_ipv4_range_names
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be like this instead?

Suggested change
subnetwork = var.additional_ip_ranges_config.value.subnetwork
pod_ipv4_range_names = var.additional_ip_ranges_config.value.pod_ipv4_range_names
subnetwork = additional_ip_ranges_config.value.subnetwork
pod_ipv4_range_names = additional_ip_ranges_config.value.pod_ipv4_range_names

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@DrFaust92 - Can you please add a usage to the existing node_pool example and test data so we have sufficient test coverage. Thanks!

Signed-off-by: drfaust92 <ilia.lazebnik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: drfaust92 <ilia.lazebnik@gmail.com>
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 marked this pull request as draft September 28, 2025 01:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants