Skip to content

chore: test with old python version #71

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor

@johanneskoester johanneskoester commented Jun 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a new test to verify version compatibility for Snakemake.
    • Moved the Snakemake version check test to a dedicated test file.
    • Introduced automated testing for the minimum supported Python version.
  • Chores
    • Updated workflow configuration to streamline environment setup and testing processes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 23, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new workflow job was added to test the minimum Python version environment, and the explicit Pixi version was removed from workflow jobs. Additionally, a test for Snakemake version checking was moved from an existing test file to a dedicated new test file, with no other changes to test logic.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml Removed explicit Pixi version from actions; added test-min-python job for minimum Python version testing.
tests/test_snakemake_dependent.py Added new test file containing test_snakemake_version for Snakemake version utility.
tests/tests.py Removed test_snakemake_version function and its import; no other changes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Code Checkout
    participant Pixi Installer
    participant Test Runner

    GitHub Actions->>Code Checkout: Checkout repository
    GitHub Actions->>Pixi Installer: Install Pixi (env: minpyver)
    GitHub Actions->>Test Runner: Run tests for min Python version
Loading
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

59-70: LGTM! Fix missing newline at end of file.

The new test-min-python job structure is consistent with existing jobs and properly uses the minpyver environment for testing minimum Python version compatibility.

       - name: Run tests with min python
-        run: pixi run --environment minpyver test-min-python -v
+        run: pixi run --environment minpyver test-min-python -v
+
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 035f375 and 8073c47.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pyproject.toml is excluded by !pyproject.toml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_snakemake_dependent.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/tests.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.py`: Do not try to improve formatting. Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods. Do not suggest type annotation of the `s...

**/*.py: Do not try to improve formatting.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the self argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the cls argument of classmethods.
Do not suggest return type annotation if a function or method does not contain a return statement.

  • tests/tests.py
  • tests/test_snakemake_dependent.py
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/test.yml

[error] 70-70: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/tests.py (1)

72-72: LGTM!

The method call is correct and the reorganization of Snakemake-specific tests to a dedicated file is a good practice.

tests/test_snakemake_dependent.py (1)

4-6: ```shell
#!/bin/bash

Inspect Pixi configuration for the minpyver environment and test-min-python task

rg -A5 -B5 "[tool.pixi]" pyproject.toml
rg -A5 -B5 "test-min-python" pyproject.toml


</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant