Skip to content

add codegen test for variadics #144359

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

This is a part of #144066 that can land without FCP.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 23, 2025

r? @SparrowLii

rustbot has assigned @SparrowLii.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 23, 2025
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 23, 2025

📌 Commit f75595d has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 23, 2025
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2025
…r-errors

add codegen test for variadics

This is a part of rust-lang#144066 that can land without FCP.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #144356 (Add `ignore-backends` annotations in failing GCC backend ui tests)
 - #144359 (add codegen test for variadics)
 - #144376 (Suggest unwrapping when private method name is available in inner type)
 - #144379 (test using multiple c-variadic ABIs in the same program)
 - #144383 (disable cfg.has_reliable_f128 on amdgcn)
 - #144409 (Stop compilation early if macro expansion failed)
 - #144412 (Small cleanup: Use LocalKey<Cell> methods more)
 - #144421 (Call `is_parsed_attribute` rather than keeping track of a list of parsed attributes manually)
 - #144422 (library/windows_targets: Fix macro expansion error in 'link' macro)
 - #144424 (Allow setting `release-blog-post` label with rustbot)
 - #144430 (tests: aarch64-outline-atomics: Remove hardcoded target)
 - #144435 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
 - #144445 (Fix `./x check bootstrap` (again))

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #144356 (Add `ignore-backends` annotations in failing GCC backend ui tests)
 - #144359 (add codegen test for variadics)
 - #144376 (Suggest unwrapping when private method name is available in inner type)
 - #144379 (test using multiple c-variadic ABIs in the same program)
 - #144383 (disable cfg.has_reliable_f128 on amdgcn)
 - #144409 (Stop compilation early if macro expansion failed)
 - #144412 (Small cleanup: Use LocalKey<Cell> methods more)
 - #144421 (Call `is_parsed_attribute` rather than keeping track of a list of parsed attributes manually)
 - #144422 (library/windows_targets: Fix macro expansion error in 'link' macro)
 - #144424 (Allow setting `release-blog-post` label with rustbot)
 - #144430 (tests: aarch64-outline-atomics: Remove hardcoded target)
 - #144435 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
 - #144445 (Fix `./x check bootstrap` (again))

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants