Skip to content

Conversation

feanil
Copy link

@feanil feanil commented Sep 25, 2025

Remove reactifex and @edx/reactifex packages from devDependencies as they are no longer
needed. Translation extraction functionality has been verified to work
correctly without these dependencies.

Co-Authored-By: Claude noreply@anthropic.com

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.17%. Comparing base (3f71ade) to head (d2d5dcc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1274   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.17%   81.17%           
=======================================
  Files          51       51           
  Lines         834      834           
  Branches      240      231    -9     
=======================================
  Hits          677      677           
  Misses        150      150           
  Partials        7        7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@feanil feanil marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2025 15:10
@feanil feanil enabled auto-merge September 25, 2025 15:10
@feanil feanil mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2025
20 tasks
@feanil feanil disabled auto-merge September 25, 2025 18:46
@feanil feanil enabled auto-merge September 25, 2025 19:29
Remove reactifex and @edx/reactifex packages from devDependencies as they are no longer
needed. Translation extraction functionality has been verified to work
correctly without these dependencies.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@brian-smith-tcril brian-smith-tcril force-pushed the feanil/remove-reactifex-packages branch from 0b02be7 to d2d5dcc Compare September 26, 2025 19:48
@brian-smith-tcril
Copy link
Contributor

@arbrandes the problem you noticed in #1262 (comment) is showing up here too, it's because of branch protection rules looking specifically for "tests (thing)" instead of "tests (thing, version)"

I'm happy to update the branch protection rules here. For the other repos I did it before landing the "add 24 to the matrix" PRs and updated the rules to look for "tests (thing, 20)"

Considering #1266 has already landed, which version should I update this one to?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants