Skip to content

[tests] tighten compilation tests for quantization #12002

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions tests/quantization/bnb/test_4bit.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -886,6 +886,7 @@ def quantization_config(self):
components_to_quantize=["transformer", "text_encoder_2"],
)

@require_bitsandbytes_version_greater("0.46.1")
def test_torch_compile(self):
torch._dynamo.config.capture_dynamic_output_shape_ops = True
super().test_torch_compile()
Expand Down
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions tests/quantization/bnb/test_mixed_int8.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -847,6 +847,10 @@ def quantization_config(self):
components_to_quantize=["transformer", "text_encoder_2"],
)

@pytest.mark.xfail(
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@matthewdouglas I get:

- 0/0: expected type of 'module._modules['norm_out']._modules['linear']._parameters['weight'].CB' to be a tensor type, ' but found <class 'NoneType'>

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the time being I'm not sure that we can do a whole lot to avoid this for bnb int8. At the very least it is not a high priority for us. Not 100% sure but it's possible you could get around this by making a forward pass through the model prior to compiling it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will note this down then in the xfail reason.

reason="Test fails because of an offloading problem from Accelerate with confusion in hooks."
" Test passes without recompilation context manager. Refer to https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/12002/files#r2240462757 for details."
)
def test_torch_compile(self):
torch._dynamo.config.capture_dynamic_output_shape_ops = True
super()._test_torch_compile(torch_dtype=torch.float16)
Expand Down
10 changes: 8 additions & 2 deletions tests/quantization/test_torch_compile_utils.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,12 +56,18 @@ def _test_torch_compile(self, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16):
pipe.transformer.compile(fullgraph=True)

# small resolutions to ensure speedy execution.
pipe("a dog", num_inference_steps=2, max_sequence_length=16, height=256, width=256)
with torch._dynamo.config.patch(error_on_recompile=True):
pipe("a dog", num_inference_steps=2, max_sequence_length=16, height=256, width=256)

def _test_torch_compile_with_cpu_offload(self, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16):
pipe = self._init_pipeline(self.quantization_config, torch_dtype)
pipe.enable_model_cpu_offload()
pipe.transformer.compile()
# regional compilation is better for offloading.
# see: https://pytorch.org/blog/torch-compile-and-diffusers-a-hands-on-guide-to-peak-performance/
if getattr(pipe.transformer, "_repeated_blocks"):
pipe.transformer.compile_repeated_blocks(fullgraph=True)
else:
pipe.transformer.compile()

# small resolutions to ensure speedy execution.
pipe("a dog", num_inference_steps=2, max_sequence_length=16, height=256, width=256)
Expand Down
Loading