Make integration-test independent from current libraries version

[cmaglie]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

See how to contribute

• The PR has no duplicates (please search among the Pull Requests
  before creating one)
• The PR follows
  our contributing guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
• UPGRADING.md has been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)
• configuration.schema.json updated if new parameters are added.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Fix some integration tests.

What is the current behavior?

CI Fails:

      profile_lib_commands_test.go:359: 
          	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/arduino-cli/arduino-cli/internal/integrationtest/daemon/profile_lib_commands_test.go:359
          	Error:      	Not equal: 
          	            	expected: []*commands.ProfileLibraryReference{(*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d6500), (*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d6540), (*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d6580), (*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d65c0), (*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d6600), (*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d6640)}
          	            	actual  : []*commands.ProfileLibraryReference{(*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d62c0), (*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d6300), (*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d6380), (*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d63c0), (*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d6440), (*commands.ProfileLibraryReference)(0xc0004d64c0)}
          	            	
          	            	Diff:
          	            	--- Expected
          	            	+++ Actual
          	            	@@ -27,3 +27,3 @@
          	            	     Name: (string) (len=15) "Arduino_RPClite",
          	            	-    Version: (string) (len=5) "0.2.0",
          	            	+    Version: (string) (len=5) "0.2.1",
          	            	     IsDependency: (bool) true
          	Test:       	TestProfileLibRemoveWithDeps
  --- FAIL: TestProfileLibRemoveWithDeps (12.33s)

What is the new behavior?

CI Pass.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change, and is titled accordingly?

Other information

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 69.49%. Comparing base (f122326) to head (7a1c2ef).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3069      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.50%   69.49%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         253      253              
  Lines       19172    19172              
==========================================
- Hits        13326    13323       -3     
- Misses       4616     4617       +1     
- Partials     1230     1232       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	69.49% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.