Skip to content

Sync eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR 11291 #46119

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2025

Conversation

azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Sync eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR Azure/azure-sdk-tools#11291 See eng/common workflow

@azure-sdk azure-sdk requested review from Copilot and mikeharder and removed request for mikeharder July 22, 2025 19:28
@azure-sdk azure-sdk requested a review from a team as a code owner July 22, 2025 19:28
@azure-sdk azure-sdk added EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system. Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team. labels Jul 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR syncs the eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR 11291, adding a .NET installation step to the performance testing pipeline template. This ensures that .NET is available in the environment before running performance tests that may depend on .NET tooling.

Key changes:

  • Adds .NET installation step to the performance pipeline template

@azure-sdk azure-sdk merged commit 3e0a6be into main Jul 23, 2025
16 checks passed
@azure-sdk azure-sdk deleted the sync-eng/common-perf-install-dotnet-11291 branch July 23, 2025 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team. EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants