-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
Implement event assignments in JAX #3080
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3080 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 78.23% 78.27% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 315 315
Lines 20478 20524 +46
Branches 1500 1500
==========================================
+ Hits 16021 16065 +44
- Misses 4448 4450 +2
Partials 9 9
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
cab120b to
7698822
Compare
support explicit initial value event assignments fix deltax tcl
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fröhlich <fabian.frohlich@crick.ac.uk>
This reverts commit 82caa94.
c1b8809 to
bc51bb4
Compare
|
Let‘s temporarily disable |
FFroehlich
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dweindl only minor changes to non-jax bits but feel free to weigh in as well
dweindl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool, thanks. Can't say much on the JAX part. The rest looks good to me, except for the x_old thing.
| ... | ||
|
|
||
| @abstractmethod | ||
| def _delta_x( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fine as is, but it's a bit funny that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC this is a matter of different naming conventions in different parts of the code base so shouldn't be too hard to harmonise, but I'd want to check with @FFroehlich to be sure of that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
open to changing that, but if we do so, let's do it in a separate PR.
|



No description provided.