You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<p>I am a final year PhD candidate at University of
130
134
Michigan, Ann Arbor. My research interests are at the
131
135
intersection of Machine Learning and Human-Computer
132
136
Interaction (HCI).</p>
@@ -168,6 +172,17 @@
168
172
<divclass="experience" id="publications">
169
173
170
174
<h2class="section-header">Publications</h2>
175
+
<divclass="row experience-card">
176
+
<divclass="col-md-8 offset-md-2">
177
+
<divclass="card mb-4">
178
+
<divclass="card-body">
179
+
<h3class="card-title">Evaluating LLMs for Targeted Concept Simplification for Domain-Specific Texts.</h3>
180
+
<h4class="card-subtitle mb-2 text-muted">In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6208–6226, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.</h4>
<h3class="card-title">Adaptive methods for supporting students in course learning</h3>
417
+
<h3class="card-title">Designing adaptive assessments for understanding students knowledge in course learning</h3>
384
418
<p>
385
419
Personalized AI can improve education significantly by giving each student the opportunity to learn at their own pace and understanding.
386
-
In this work, I am leveraging cognitive theory retention of concepts to build an adaptive course practice scheduler that allows students to practice
387
-
course materials. The algorithm uses RL on the underlying memory model to adaptively schedule concepts for practice that account for past recall of concepts
388
-
as well as maximize lookahead gains of learning future concepts.
420
+
In this work, I am leveraging cognitive theory concept understanding to build an adaptive assessment methodology that assesses student competence while minimizing burden on them.
421
+
I formulated a structured decision space of concepts necessary to understand the course, and combined LLM interaction with a submodular objective evaluation of concepts.
422
+
</p>
423
+
</div>
424
+
</div>
425
+
</div>
426
+
</div>
427
+
<divclass="project row experience-card">
428
+
<divclass="col-md-8 offset-md-2">
429
+
<divclass="card mb-4">
430
+
<divclass="card-body">
431
+
<h3class="card-title">Alinging AI-assisted decision-making with end-user preferences</h3>
432
+
<p>
433
+
AI may make decisions that do not always align with end-user sensibilities. For example, during personalization, systems
434
+
may collect data and infer and use sensitive attributes about their users without their awareness or consent. In this work, I engineered a Human-AI interactive system
435
+
that collects the most optimal and informative data about its users for personalization using a submodular objective. In a between and within-subjects user study,
436
+
I then demonstrated that users show differential preferences for the usage of sensitive attributes about them that the AI infers.
437
+
Their preferences depend on the sensitivity and the accuracy of inferences. The study provides concrete evidence of incorporating explicit
438
+
user feedback in systems for aligning AI objectives with user preferences.
389
439
</p>
390
440
</div>
391
441
</div>
@@ -395,10 +445,11 @@ <h3 class="card-title">Adaptive methods for supporting students in course learni
395
445
<divclass="col-md-8 offset-md-2">
396
446
<divclass="card mb-4">
397
447
<divclass="card-body">
398
-
<h3class="card-title">Building agents that learn about users for personalization while respecting their privacy.</h3>
399
-
<p>Understanding the privacy implications of human - agent interactions when agents try to learn about users for personalization.
400
-
Built a bayesian network from a massive data of user preferences and using the network to drive interactions in a quantative study to
401
-
measure privacy violations and privacy concerns, so that more privacy-aware agents can be built.
448
+
<h3class="card-title">Aligning Wikipedia article quality assessment by learning from policy-guided Wikipedia edits.</h3>
449
+
<p>Content assessment is guided by content policies -- neutral point of view (NPOV), citations, and clear writing. For AI to understand
450
+
Wikipedia content quality assessment, it needs to understand the application of the content policies in-context. I showed that Wikipedia
451
+
edits that instantiate these content policies learn more aligned assessments of Wikipedia content policies than learning form
0 commit comments