I came across unexpected behavior for stochastic next functions with the `_period` argument. For `N_PERIODS = 3` and a binary state I thought we needed a 2x2 matrix (one for each period transition). But the following does not throw an error: ```python @lcm.mark.stochastic def next_dummy_state(_period): pass DUMMY_STATE_TRANSITION = jnp.array( [[0.5, 0.5]] ) ``` I checked it's actually included in the model, providing an empty transition matrices raises an indexing error as expected. Providing a matrix that's "too large" (e.g. `(4, 2)`) here also doesn't result in an error.